An Ambitious Sci-Fi Misfire With Franchise Potential Gets Reappraised


battle los angeles

through Sony

It’s turn into more and more laborious for an authentic blockbuster to make a splash on the field workplace when field workplace takings have confirmed that IP continues to be the primary manner of placing butts in seats, however 2011’s Battle: Los Angeles made a good fist of stating a case as a possible franchise.

While evaluations weren’t precisely overwhelmingly enthusiastic, a $211 haul from theaters plus the extra income introduced in on dwelling video noticed it flip a tidy revenue. However, the margins evidently weren’t sturdy sufficient to justify sequels, even when the idea lent itself extremely nicely to additional exploration.

A boots on the bottom battle epic that doubles as a sci-fi motion extravaganza, experiences emerged on the time of its launch that ought to Battle: Los Angeles generate further installments, then the setting would hypothetically be modified to a distinct metropolis every day trip. That would have been an ingenious technique to proceed freshening up the idea, with followers at the moment lamenting the one-and-done property as we converse.

Battle: Los Angeles

The prospect of seeing the likes of Battle: New York, Battle: London, and Battle: Tokyo would have been a startlingly distinctive technique to hold mining a precious premise with out falling into method, even when the crux of every movie would have basically been the identical; specifically, native forces staving off the specter of intergalactic extermination.

It wasn’t to be, although, however primarily based on the variety of commenters in settlement over the wasted potential and missed alternatives that got here hooked up to the solidly-if-unspectacularly profitable Battle: Los Angeles, Sony missed a trick.

Leave a Comment